The problem
You have tried it. It came back beige.
You typed "write a LinkedIn post about my accountancy firm" and got 150 words that could be any accountant in Britain. "In today's fast-paced business landscape." Straight in the bin.
That is not the tool being bad. It is the tool not knowing you. ChatGPT has read the whole internet and none of it was about your business, your customer, or the way you actually talk to people. So it gives you the average of everyone.
Where it gets expensive
So you fix it in the prompt. Every time.
You add "we're a friendly firm in Ipswich, keep it casual, no jargon" to the top of every request. By Thursday you have stopped bothering. The output drifts. Every post sounds a bit different because every prompt was a bit different.
Then you set up an automation, or someone sells you one, and now the wrong thing is being produced reliably, five times a week, in your name.
A real snippet from mineBanned words: leverage, synergise, "game-changer" and hype superlatives generally, corporate filler, anything that sounds like a LinkedIn guru.
Kept phrases (real speech): "to be fair", "that kind of thing", "does my head in", "half-arsing it", "no vanity metrics".
AI-writing rule: every drafted piece passes an AI-tells check before it ships. If it reads like AI wrote it, it is off-brand.
The fix
Tell it once, or tell it every time.
A source of truth is one document with everything the AI needs to know before it writes: who you are, who it is for, what you promise, what you are against, how you sound, what you will never say, and what it is allowed to do without asking you.
You paste it in first. Then you ask for the post. The gap between what you were getting and what you get now is the whole trick, and it is why the Prompt Pack says "paste your context first" at the top of every prompt.
The catch with most templates is that nobody fills them in. So this one interviews you instead. You talk, it writes, you correct. Half an hour.